Greetings from Nanjing !!!

Rape of Nanjing, whose fault? (I’m not asking if rape of Nanjing is true or false, but asking why there should be rape.)

Had the Chinese greeted the Japanese in Nanjing like the Han Chinese greeted the Manchu invaders about 300 years before, there could be no Nanjing execution and the Japanese troops would march into Nanjing city with the Chinese hailing on both sides of the streets.

About 300 years before the battle of Nanjing, Manchu troops headed for Nanjing after “Ten Days of Yangzhou Massacre”, the Han Chinese in Nanjing didn’t fight for liberty, nor try to avenge the murderers of their “dear folk victims”, nor try to “seek justice” like they cry “Nanjing massacre” against the Japanese. Instead of defending their home, they all left their city to greet the invaders with gifts and excessive praise in fear.

The Manchus were surprised. The commander of Manchu troops, Prince Dodo didn’t even want to take a look at the hill of gifts and sea of flattering words. The invaders despised the Han Chinese as human trash! They took the city of Nanjing peacefully in the defenders’ greetings.

The author of “Rape of Nanjing” should have written another book called “Greetings from Nanjing”! And it’s the historical fact. She doesn’t need to fabricate anything like she has done in “Rape of Nanjing”.

So, why should there be “rape of Nanjing”?
If the Han Chinese should greet the Manchus which they call “beasts”, why should they NOT have greeted the Japanese which they call “inferior devils”?
If it should be called “brotherhood” to greet the Manchu invaders, why should they not do the same to greet the Japanese?